A prospective observational study on BBV152 coronavirus vaccine use in adolescents and comparison with adults- first real-world safety analysis (preprint)

Background The BBV152 COVID-19 vaccine (COVAXIN) has recently been approved for adolescents. We provide the first real world safety data of COVAXIN use in adolescents and compare this with adults. Methods A prospective observational study is being conducted since January 2022. Enrolled adolescents and adults were contacted telephonically after 14 days of receiving the BBV152 vaccine. Primary outcome was vaccine safety assessed as rates of adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Severity grading of AEFIs was done using the FDA scale. Findings A total of 698 adolescents and 326 adults were enrolled. AEFIs occurred in 36.3% adolescents after first and in 37.9% after second dose. Systemic involvement was seen in 15-17% adolescents. Injection site pain and fever were the common AEFIs. Majority of AEFIs were mild-moderate. Severe and atypical AEFIs were observed in 0.9% and 0.6% adolescents respectively. Majority of AEFIs recovered in 1-2 days. In >2% adolescents, AEFIs were persisting at 14-day follow-up since the second dose. No difference in AEFI incidence and patterns was observed between adolescents and adults. Regression analysis showed females and those with history of allergy to be respectively at 1.5-times and 3-times increased risk of AEFIs among adolescents. Interpretation COVAXIN carries an overall favorable short term safety profile in adolescents. The observed AEFI rates in adolescents are much lower than that reported with mRNA vaccines. Female adolescents and those with history of allergy need watchfulness. With some AEFIs persisting at 14 days, a longer follow-up is recommended to strengthen the safety data of these vaccines. Funding No funding support

Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India (preprint)

Background: There is paucity of real-world data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety from cohort designs. The current study aimed to evaluate vaccine performance during second wave in India. It also aimed to determine adverse events of significant concern (AESCs), and to ascertain the effect of vaccination on persistent health issues in individuals post COVID-19. Methods: A cohort study was conducted from July-2021 to December-2021 in a tertiary hospital of north India. The primary outcome was vaccine-effectiveness against COVID-19. Secondary outcomes were AESCs, and persistent health issues in those receiving vaccine. Regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors. Results: In 2760 healthcare workers (HCWs) included, 1033 COVID-19 events were reported. Around 6-17% vaccine effectiveness was observed against COVID-19 occurrence. One dose-recipients were at 1.6-times increased risk of COVID-19. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was a strong independent protective factor against COVID-19 (aOR 0.66). Full vaccination reduced moderate-severe COVID-19 by 57%. Those with lung disease were at 2.5-times increased risk of moderate-severe COVID-19. AESCs were observed in 1.3% including one case each of myocarditis and severe hypersensitivity. Individuals with hypothyroidism were at 5-times and those receiving vaccine after recovery from COVID-19 were at 3-times higher risk of persistent health issues. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination reduced COVID-19 severity but offered marginal protection against occurrence. Relationship of asthma and hypothyroidism with COVID-19 outcomes necessitates focused research. Independent protection of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was high and persistent health issues were common in individuals receiving vaccine post COVID-19. Recommendations of vaccinating those recovered from COVID-19 need further studies.